For a fleeting moment, the end was in clear sight…
On the afternoon of July 12, Dr. Ross Jones, the last of CRWC’s expert witnesses, took the stand in the Newfane courtroom to offer his testimony relating to Entergy Vermont Yankee’s request for an additional one degree fahrenheit increase to its existing summer discharge limits. Dr. Jones’s primary concern, that Entergy had not conducted sufficient studies to show that its thermal discharage was not at least a contributing factor to the significant decline in American shad in the Connecticut River, was significantly bolstered when the Judge Wright made a ruling under Vermont Rule of Evidence 703 which allowed Dr. Jones to rely on the contents of a letter from the U.S. Department of the Interior in forming his opinion for the Court. The letter, received by CRWC on July 2, and authored by fish biologists at the Silvio O. Conte Anadromous Fish Laboratory in Turner’s Falls, MA, substantially corroborated CRWC’s contention that the passage facilities at Turner’s Falls Dam could not be the only cause of dramatic decline in shad in the Vernon reach of the River. In particular, the letter also highlighted the importance of studying the extent of the downstream effect of Vermont Yankee’s thermal influence and outlined several studies, not previously conducted by Entergy, that would assess the extent of the effect of temperature increase on the upstream and downstream migration of shad.
Upon completion of Dr. Jones’s live direct testimony, and after a surprisingly brief cross-examination by Entergy, the live testimony portion of trial concluded. Taking what seemed only to be a brief moment to reflect on all that had happened during the nine days in Newfane, the team’s focus then quickly shifted to wrapping things up. First came revisions to pre-filed testimony, then drafting of rebuttal testimony by our expert witnesses, and finally making motions to strike portions of any testimony offered (pre-filed, live, or rebuttal). Everything appeared to be on schedule for brief submission by August 9th; well, that was until Entergy filed 196 individual objections to CRWC testimony and requested five additional court days to cross CRWC experts and offer additional live testimony from Entergy experts.
In response to Entergy’s motions and request, Judge Wright held a hearing at the Environmental Court in Berlin yesterday (July 26), a day originally set for any cross-examination on rebuttal. Each of the parties offered oral argument relating to the motions to strike and also settled on a revised court and briefing schedule that tentatively calls for complete submission of briefs and responses by September 10. It is safe to say that this date is by no means set in stone.
More to come on Judge Wright’s upcoming rulings on the motions to strike and any new developments that arise in the weeks to come…